|
Click on Thumbnail to enlarge
|
Plains Indian Smallpox Native populations of the Americas lacked immunity to the infectious diseases that had ravaged Europe and Asia for centuries. Sparse populations on the Plains, and in the pristine valleys of the Rocky Mountains, prevented a buildup of communicable diseases. The "white man" diseases…measles, chicken pox, typhus, typhoid fever, dysentery, scarlet fever, diphtheria, and after 1832, cholera…were devastating to the American Indian. Lumped together, these diseases did not equal the havoc of smallpox in terms of number of deaths, realignment of tribal alliances, and subsequent changes in Canadian and American Indian Cultures.
**The Mountain Sheep in this picture is the same as the one on the Storyteller page. This picture is a composite for an oil painting by wildlife photographer and artist, Lorna Hester Hawkins of Afton, Wyoming. Smallpox in the New World:African slaves were used on the sugar plantation of the West Indies, and with them came smallpox. The first of these slaves were brought by Columbus. In 1495, fifty-seven to eighty percent of the native population of Santa Domingo and in 1515, two-thirds of the Indians of Puerto Rico were wiped out by smallpox. Ten years after Cortez arrived in Mexico, the native population had been reduced from twenty-five million to six million five hundred thousand a reduction of seventy-four percent. Even the most conservative estimates place the deaths from smallpox above sixty-five percent (Bray). Prior to the arrival of Europeans, various sources estimate native population in North and South America at ninety to one hundred million. In the fifteen hundreds, the American Indian population in North America has been estimated at approximately twelve million, but by the early nineteen hundreds, the population had been reduced to roughly four hundred and seventy-four thousand. It is impossible to arrive at a number for the millions of American Indians killed during this period by European diseases with smallpox the deadliest by far. Smallpox reached what was to become the United States either from Canada or the West Indies. The first major outbreak of an infectious disease recorded on the northeastern Atlantic coast was 1616-19. The Massachusetts and other Algonquin tribes in the area were reduced from an estimated thirty thousand to three hundred (Bray). When the Pilgrims landed a year later in 1620, there was few Indians left to greet them. Many observers believe this infectious disease was smallpox. By the end of the sixteen hundreds, smallpox had spread up and down the eastern seaboard and as far west as the Great Lakes. Stearn and Stearn estimated there were approximately one million one hundred and fifty thousand Indians living north of the Rio Grande in the early sixteenth-century, but by 1907, there were less than four hundred thousand (Bray). This decline was not due to smallpox alone. Other diseases played a role, as did intertribal warfare and conflicts with the United States. It was inevitable that when Europeans came to America that European diseases were going to run rampant through the indigenous populations of the Americas. The native populations of North and South America had no immunities, or genetic tolerance, to any of the European diseases, and not all white Americans had immunities to them either. It is commonly believed that syphilis spread from Native Americans to Europeans. There is developing DNA evidence that there was syphilis in Europe prior to Columbus's time. Like every other disease there is growing evidence that Europeans brought syphilis to America.
With the exception of man's oldest disease, Malaria, the scourges of mankind have resulted from dense populations living in small compact areas…overcrowded cities with little or no sanitation. Before the arrival of the white man, the Plains Indians as primarily hunter-gatherers were free of communicable diseases. Smallpox passes through the air in droplets discharged from the nose and mouth. It spreads from the lungs of an infected person into the lungs of a susceptible person. Smallpox can survive years on the clothing and bedding used by smallpox victims. In the early seventeen hundreds, a smallpox outbreak in Quebec resulted in many deaths. In 1854, a pipeline laid through where the victims had been buried resulted in another smallpox outbreak. History of Smallpox Vaccination:An English physician, Edward Jenner observed that dairymaids with a relatively mild disease called cowpox were immune to smallpox. On May 14, 1796, Jenner infected James Phipps with serum taken from a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes. After being infected with the cowpox, Phipps survived repeated attempts to infect him with smallpox. Despite Jenner’s vaccination procedure, smallpox still took its toll over the next hundred years; 800,000 Russians died from smallpox during the eighteen hundreds (Bray). By 1840, smallpox vaccination in Britain was free for all infants. Vaccination was made compulsory by an Act of Parliament in the year 1853; again in 1867; and still more stringent in 1871. Deaths from smallpox in the first 10 years after the enforcement of Vaccination was 33,515, and from 1864 to 1873 the figure more than double to 70,458 deaths (see, Compulsory Vaccination in England by William Tebb). The mortality rate in vaccinated infants was so high that many mothers did all they could to not vaccinate their babies. Eighty-eight years after Jenner's first use of serum (lymph) for vaccination, William Tebb wrote, “ The lymph used [for vaccination] was of unknown origin, kept in capillary glass tubes, from whence it was blown into a cup into which the lancet was dipped. No pretence of cleaning the lancet was made; it drew blood in very many instances.....no one can estimate the number of healthy, innocent children, as well as adults, who are inoculated with syphilis or other foul disease…An article in the Glasgow Herald for March 4th, 1878 stated: it is, indeed, a most serious matter to find that the deaths from the 15 diseases have increased in England and Wales from 124,799 in 1847, to 217,707 in 1875, whilst the population has only risen from 18 millions to less than 23 millions (see, Tebb Article).” Vaccination in America: Dr. Benjamin Waterhouse introduced vaccination to the United States in 1800. Due to contamination and lack of preservation, the vaccines were often infected with bacteria, which sometimes resulted in sickness or death. An article in the New York Times for June 19th, 1880, stated,
How effective was vaccination?:
Historians and many others have asked, “Why weren't the Indians vaccinated against smallpox?” In 1832, Congress appropriated twelve hundred dollars to begin the fight against smallpox in Indian country. One year later, actual expenditures were down to seven hundred and twenty-one dollars. Based on this, there are those that believe the Government deliberately withheld smallpox vaccine from Native Americans, and thus committed Indian Genocide. If this is what you believe, consider this....why is there a controversy raging today over the safety of vaccinating large numbers of Americans with the smallpox virus (see, Smallpox Vaccination). With a perceived danger from vaccination based on today's medical technology, what would have been the danger in the early eighteen hundreds to vaccinating American Indians that had no immunity to European diseases? Smallpox vaccination of the Native Americans could have had disastrous results. What would have been the results of smallpox vaccination on the Native American Indians that had no immunity to European diseases, or to the domesticated animals of the Europeans? The cowpox virus could have been as deadly to Native Americans as the smallpox virus. To understand the problems associated with any vaccination program in the eighteen hundreds, the efficacy of the vaccine and the dangers of introducing other diseases must be considered. Completely unknown at that time were such health safeguards as sterile procedures, sterile instruments, sterile vaccine, refrigeration, attenuated viruses, overnight transportation, etc, etc. During the eighteen hundreds, a great many Americans feared vaccination more than they did the risk of catching smallpox. Lack of funding a smallpox vaccination program and the Amherst letters have been taken by some writers and organizations to justify a cry of Indian Genocide - iwchildren.org. To this charge, I have one question...how many Native American Indians, with a well-founded distrust for the white man, were going to have their arms scratched with something out of a bottle that had previously wiped out entire Indian villages? If the Indian Nations had been vaccinated with the cowpox virus, the ensuing death loss among Native Americans would have raised a hue and cry across the land...then the cry, and rightly so, would have been the Government is committing genocide by vaccinating Indians with the cowpox virus. A reader referred me to this site on an interesting and unique vaccination program by the King of Spain, Carlos IV, to vaccinate Spanish subjects around the world.
It would be interesting to know the efficacy and mortality rate from Balmis' vaccination program. The procedure used by Balmis was far superior to the use of the non-sterile cowpox virus, but this technique was basically what Larpentuer did with the Indian women at Fort Union. Smallpox and the Plains Indians:A smallpox outbreak in 1780-82 followed the distribution and trade route of the Indian horse (Haines). The outbreak in 1800-02 spreads from the Plains Indians to the Indians along the Pacific coast. Despite heavy losses during these periods, the most devastating outbreak of smallpox was yet to come. In 1832, the first steamboat, a small side-wheeler named, Yellow Stone, reached Fort Union at the mouth of the Yellowstone River. The use of steamboats on the Missouri allowed large quantities of trade goods to move up and down the river. The buffalo hide trade now become more important than the trade in furs. Remote Indian villages brought their buffalo hides to the American Fur Company posts. This set the stage for ensuing disaster. In June of 1837, the St. Peter arrived at Fort Clark, 60 miles north of present day Bismarck, North Dakota. Knowing there were men aboard the boat with smallpox, F. A. Chardon and others of the American Fur Company tried to keep the Mandans away from the boat, but to no avail. The two Mandan villages that had provided aid to Lewis and Clark during the winter of 1804-05 were devastated. Thirty-one Mandans out of a population of sixteen hundred survived the epidemic. The 1837 smallpox outbreaks were initially confined to the Indian tribes that lived by, or had come to trade at, the upper Missouri River trading posts. The Mandan, Blackfeet, and the Assiniboine nations suffered the highest number of deaths. The 1837-40 smallpox outbreaks were said to have a ninety-eight percent death rate among those infected (Bray).
Despite warnings from the traders, Hidatsa, Arikara, and Sioux warriors raided the empty Mandan villages and carried smallpox back to their people. Hundreds of lodges like the one above stood as mute testimony to the devastation of smallpox. As one writer wrote, “No language can picture the scene of desolation which the country presents. In whatever direction we go we see nothing but melancholy wrecks of human life. The tents are still standing on every hill, but no rising smoke announces the presence of human beings, and no sounds, but the croaking of the raven and the howling of the wolf interrupts the fearful silence (Chittenden).” The St. Peters continued on to Fort Union arriving there on June 24, 1837. The only Indians at the post were the Indian wives of thirty employees. Hoping to control the infection before the Assiniboine arrived for the September trade, Larpentuer noted that, “prompt measures were adopted to prevent an epidemic.” The measures taken were to vaccinate the Indian women. According to Larpentuer, “their systems were prepared according to Dr. Thomas’ Medical Book and they were vaccinated from Halsey himself…the operation proved fatal to most of our patients.” Larpentuer goes on to say, "About fifteen days afterwards there was such a stench in the fort that it could be smelt at a distance of 300 yards. It was awful--the scene in the fort where some went crazy, and others were half eatin by maggots before they died." This was during the hottest part of the summer (Chittenden). Jacob Halsey was in charge of Fort Union, and had been infected coming upriver on the boat. Five months later, he claimed only four died from the attempted vaccination. Halsey statement is in contrast to Larpentuer comments, and his account seems highly unlikely based on the virulence of the smallpox virus. The Assiniboine started arriving at the post while the “controlled infection” was in full force. Infected Assiniboine carried smallpox back into Canada. From Fort Union smallpox spread by boat to Fort McKenzie near the junction of the Marias and the Missouri rivers. Basically, the same story was repeated with the Blackfeet. There is no way to know how many Indians of the upper Missouri and the Plains of Canada were infected with smallpox. Estimates on the number killed range from sixty thousand to one hundred and fifty thousand. The most conservative estimate puts the number at more than 15,000 deaths (Chittenden). The American Fur Company traders can certainly be criticized for the handling of the 1837 smallpox outbreak, especially the vaccination of the Indian women. However at the time and under the prevailing circumstances, the traders did the best they could. Even though the Indians were repeatedly warned to stay away from the posts, they insisted on trading their goods. It is hard to believe there was any malicious intent on the part of the fur traders when the fur company’s economic survival depended on the Indian buffalo robe trade. The Indian Culture played a part in the high death rate. The use of the sweat lodge-cold water plunge may well have doubled the fatalities among the Plains tribes (Haines). This is not meant as criticism of the Sweat Lodge which was, and is, extremely important in the Indian Culture, but to point out that the Plains Indians had little or no concept of the dangers involved with the white-man diseases.
Indian warriors played a significant role in the spread of the smallpox. Warriors saw this as an opportunity to take lodge items, horses, and even scalps from corpses in enemy villages, and thus carried the smallpox virus back to their own people.
Added Note: I have had a lot of "hate" emails from "idiotic liberals" on Indian Genocide. Most of them were so ridiculous that I didn't post them. Here is my position on Indian Genocide...There is absolutely no question that some settlers, some military leaders, some government officials, and some states i.e., Georgia and especially California would have exterminated all Indians...But...There is absolutely no evidence that the American Government had an official (or as some claim unofficial )policy of exterminating all Indians...Or that...the American Government gave smallpox blankets to any Indians (Ecuyer was British). Indian genocide is a controversial subject on the internet and on this site. Genocide and Holocaust are words that are easy to throw around, often to grab a reader's attention, but proving them is something else. What one group calls genocide, another group may call progress. This statement is used in the same context as the saying...one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. The argument for Indian genocide is based primarily on letters written by General Jeffery Amherst during the French and Indian War. Letters by General Amherst and Colonel Bouquet mentioning spreading smallpox to Indians does not mean that this was ever carried out. Assumptions derived from letters and oral traditions are not proof of anything. Oral traditions tend to change over time and with the times. The stories also tend to change in a manner convenient to the tellers… If you tell a story long enough, it acquires the semblance of fact. (http://www.hartwilliams.com/imdpart1.htm )
Bouquet replied that he would try and use infected blankets as a means of introducing the disease among the Indians, but was wary of the effects that it would have on his own men...at least twenty-five percent or more of Bouquet's soldiers would have been susceptible to the smallpox virus. The Amherst letter has been used to support the proposition of germ warfare or genocide against native populations. Amherst may have discussed it in correspondence with Bouquet, but there is no evidence that Colonel Bouquet carried it out. As he mentioned in his reply, Bouquet was afraid of what it would do to his own men and with good reason. 1763 was twenty-three years before Jenner’s work on vaccination, and one hundred years before Pasteur advanced his germ theory. The only thing known about smallpox in 1763 was…age, color of skin, social status meant nothing to the smallpox virus...an infected person died or, if lucky enough to survive, was often disfigured for life. No matter how bad Amherst may have wanted to be rid of the Indians, it seems doubtful that Bouquet would unleash a disease on his soldiers that had already killed millions of his own countrymen. There is no evidence that Col. Bouquet took any action on Amherst's letter, but there is evidence that during an Indian siege Captain Ecuyer at Fort Pitt did.
The incident with Captain Ecuyer occurred during the Pontiac Rebellion. There is also evidence that Ecuyer tried to control the spread of smallpox, at least from his own men.
In 1763, Fort Pitt was under siege by Indian forces under the command of Chief Pontiac (Pontiac Rebellion by Tebbel). With smallpox in the garrison at Fort Pitt and Indians attacking the fort, two blankets would have had little to do with the spread of smallpox among the Indians. A by far greater source for spreading the smallpox virus would have been infected blood from mutilated soldier and settler bodies, scalps, clothing, and in some cases cannibalism, which occurred during the Pontiac Rebellion. Every warrior that returned from Fort Pitt to Indian villages up and down the East coast with smallpox infected war trophies carried the smallpox virus with them. Contaminated warriors spreading the smallpox virus is never mentioned by proponents of Indian Genocide; it does not fit their biased agenda. This statement on smallpox is going to make a lot of people furious...good, that is the purpose. Before venting your ire take a few minutes to read the entire article, think about it with an open mind, and then please respond with documented facts to back up your argument. The American Heritage Dictionary defines genocide as the systematic and planned extermination of an entire national, racial, political, or ethnic group. Based on this definition, genocide was not carried out by the United States Government against the Indian Nations. It can be argued that Government policy was directed toward wiping out an ethnic culture, but not genocide of an ethnic group. President Jefferson wrote (Wallace):
Based on the broad definition of genocide used by the United Nations, www.preventgenocide.org, genocide was carried out against the American Indians. Based on the UN definition if a man or woman murders their family, they are guilty of genocide, but this is not the view of most people including me. A more realistic view of genocide is given by a reader's comment. I have no interest whatsoever in smallpox, except its relationship to the fur trade. In 1837, the major trade item at the upper Missouri River posts was buffalo hides, which were at that time supplied almost exclusively by Plains Indians. Needless to say, the buffalo hide trade came to a screeching halt for the next few years. What I do have an interest in is historical truth and accountability. A University of Colorado teacher, Ward Churchill, published an article on the United States Army giving out smallpox blankets to the Upper Missouri River tribes that led to the smallpox outbreak in 1837. Churchill totally fabricated this story in the 1990s. Churchill's article is not a matter of a different interpretation of the facts. It is an outright lie that he fabricated without a shred of evidence to back up his claims. The references that he cited totally disagreed with what he wrote. No college professor should be able to publish an article of lies, or plagiarize a painting, like Ward Churchill did and remain a teacher. The picture on the left was painted by Thomas Mails and is in his book The Mystic Warriors of the Plains. When Churchill sold the painting on the right, he claimed it was an original painting by him.
The defenders of Churchill would like to make this a first amendment issue, but it is not. Churchill is guilty of plagiarism, falsifying publications, lying about his ancestry, and possibly academic standing...his masters thesis cannot be found at Sangamon State in Illinois. Deep down what irks me the most about Churchill is the sheer utter stupidity of the "enlightened liberals" that defend him. I had never heard of Ward Churchill until a reader's post stated: "...the work of Ward Churchill and his kind for a true account of Indian culture and genocide. Here is a small part of what I have found out about Churchill:
The American Indian Movement Grand Governing Council representing the National and International leadership of the American Indian Movement once again is vehemently and emphatically repudiating and condemning the outrageous statements made by academic literary and Indian fraud, Ward Churchill in relationship to the 9-11 tragedy in New York City that claimed thousands of innocent people’s lives. Why does this matter? Based primarily on the lies of Ward Churchill, the use of smallpox blankets as a means of Indian genocide by the Unites States Army and the Government is in some current textbooks used in the educational system. The only documented case of smallpox blankets being given to Indians was by Captain Ecuyer of the British army. I challenge anyone to offer documented proof, except for the two blankets given out by Captain Ecuyer at Fort Pitt, of smallpox infected blankets being deliberately given to Indians as a means of spreading smallpox. As some of the replies to my comments illustrate, I have been criticized for my remarks on Indian genocide. I do not denounce all liberals...only those, and their defenders, that distort information to promote political agendas. I am opposed to anyone that distorts our historical heritage be they radical left wing liberals, or radical right wing conservatives. The greatest threat to America is not from Muslim terrorists, it is from bigoted activists like Ward Churchill re-writing American History. The teaching of a revised politically-correct American History and the spoon-fed, mindless left-wing idiots that regurgitate it is what will bring an end to America's greatness. Muslim terrorists can and should be wiped out, but ideas instilled in students minds by radical bigoted teachers and writers are more difficult to wipe out. The Indian belief is to:
All of the Muslim terrorists combined are not as much a threat to the American way of life, as the "do-gooder, hate-spewing, damn-America" bigots like Churchill and his defenders. These radical "enlightened" activists are the ones that will destroy the fabric of American life that most of us cherish...not dirt-squatting Muslim terrorists. American history is what it was and should be accurately portrayed. Good and/or bad, America's roots is its history, and to over emphasis, or in Churchill's case fabricate the bad, in terms of a biased agenda, or political correctness, destroys the very foundation of America. For America to remain great, Americans must have pride in the history of America...destroy American pride and you destroy America. Anyone with an interest in how American history is being altered by radical left-wing university activists should read the article on political correctness, the email below, and the next two articles. Dr. Thomas Brown is researching the fraud and outright lies in Churchill's paper on smallpox and Indian genocide. Dr. Brown's abstract clearly demonstrates how bigoted left-wing activists take a tiny seed of truth and grow it into a field of fabrication and lies. Churchill's papers shows the extent that radical activists go to in distorting the truth to fit a biased preconceived agenda that appeals to other activists and radical left-wingers.
The smallpox virus created havoc all over the world for hundreds of years, but for a one- or two-year period, influenza killed as many people as any known virus. The influenza outbreak of 1918-1919 killed approximately forty million people. An estimated six hundred and seventy-five thousand Americans, including Native Americans, died of influenza. This was ten times as many Americans as were killed during World War I. Of the U. S. soldiers who died in Europe, half of them fell to the influenza virus, not to the enemy (http://www.stanford.edu/group/virus/uda/)...nobody claims this was genocide. Government treaties, bureaucratic bungling, the Washita, Sand Creek, Wounded Knee, and Bear River massacres, along with forced relocation resulting in the Trail of Tears and the Navajo Long Walk created some of the darkest chapters in this country’s history. However, this does not mean that the United States Government conducted a systematic and planned extermination of the American Indians. It should also be noted that American Indians, especially East of the Mississippi, committed atrocities on the settlers as bad or worse than any that the Colonists committed on the Indians. Excellent Reader Responses (Good and Bad) are listed below. The Indian Smallpox article was written by O. Ned Eddins of Afton, Wyoming. Permission is given for material from this site to be used for school research papers. Related Articles: Indian Horse Indian Alcohol Indian Guns Trade Beads Oregon Country Lewis and Clark References A NoName's Viewpoint:
Reply:
Yes, and I would also find out these liberal policies have created a federal welfare system that has doomed millions of Americans to a life of poverty ... in some areas, lowered our educational system to that of a third world country ... and maybe worst of all "political correctness" ... congratulations.
The vast majority of pictures on television show Osama Ben Laden squatting in the dirt. What do you want to use...oppressed childhood, misunderstood, bad home life, parents didn't care, or any other "political correct" excuse put out to justify heinous crimes. Is this
racist oppression by "Europeans" why Saudi Arabia's Wahhabi clerics are teaching in
the Wahhabi
schools in Muslim countries and in this country that..."In time all mankind will
accept Islam or submit to Islamic rule." By submitting to Islamic rule, I
assume they mean to achieve this through indoctrinating young kids to be
self-bombers, or fly planes into buildings. These Muslims are dead serious, they
mean to destroy our way of life, and you make excuses for them??? Edward A.
Reply: Another View Point: I was grateful to read your rebuttal of Ward Churchill. I have recently returned to school and I find a great deal of biased revisionist history in the text books I have to read. I do want to respond to one of the replies you had. The reply stated that the Nazis used Christianity. The Nazi doctrine was one that denied all religions except Nazi beliefs. To link Christianity to the actions of the Nazis is also a great injustice. One that the liberal left would love to place in future textbooks. Here are some excerpts from an article on the damage being done by
these pseudo-intellectuals...it is well worth the time to read the whole article.: Revisionist History as Politically Correct Policy
...Undaunted, those insulated by the academy or the bureaucracy continue to extol the virtues of revisionist history, and define the world in the most simplistic and naive terms possible. Unfortunately, there could be no worse time for such antics. ...These historical interpreters give European "Imperialists" (i.e. Americans) no credit for anything that led to the development of their nation - the same nation whose government pays many of their salaries. ...Since so few of these critics can be bothered with anything more than a cursory command of world history, there are often hilarious hypocrisies in their reinterpretation of events. Indian tribes that were infamous for their savagery against other tribes are redefined as Disneyesque merchants of wisdom and peace. ...South American civilizations that practiced cannibalism and human sacrifice are now redefined as platonic and friendly victims of European "oppression." And in a classic case of politically correct myopia, the suffering of African slaves hundreds of years ago is given more attention than the suffering of Africans being enslaved today. ...I have personally confronted pro-Palestinian college "activists" and asked them if they knew anything about the First Palestinian War in 1948 or the 'Six Day War' in 1967. Thus far, not one has had a clue. ...It is both sad and disturbing to witness a young generation who so blindly accept revisionist history, and who so freely cast dispersions on the sacrifices of those who came before them. Yet, the real blame lies with those bureaucrats and academics that knowingly encourage ignorance and strife in pursuit of their pet ideological goals. ...The belief that reinterpretation can become reality only exists in the minds of people that suppose words are equivalent to actions - and have not yet had fate teach them otherwise. Reply Edward, my biggest complaint against radical professors and some Indian activists is that they use genocide, holocaust, and extermination not based on facts, but to gain readers attention and outrage to fit a biased agenda. How many of these bigoted liberals, or even left-wing democrats, refer to the Clinton Administration's attack on David Koresh and the Branch Davidians as genocide? Killing these people qualifies as genocide under any definition of genocide. Ask the average American what genocide is and the piled bodies from gas chambers and the emaciated survivors of Nazi Germany’s death camps come to mind. None of which happened to the American Indians. If you are really interested in the damage done by these radical pseudo-intellects read David Horowitz book on The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America. My suggesting this book does not mean that everything in it is factual, but a good share of it is true. Here is an email that I received from a father on the damage being done to our educational system by these bigoted college professors:
Reply It is this kind of responses from website users that makes me believe the greatest threat to America is from bigoted college teachers who are re-writing American History based on total fabrication and unsubstantiated “facts”. The teaching of a revised political correct American History, and the spoon-fed, mindless left-wing idiots that regurgitate it, is what will bring an end to America's greatness. Muslim terrorists can and should be wiped out, but ideas instilled in students minds by bigoted teachers and writers are more difficult to wipe out. The Indian belief is to:
Dr. Bob Canada
Reply: Based on Chittenden and Larpenteur's account, most of what Connell's states is inaccurate, but I have no objection to this. As you stated about poets, a writer of a novel should not be held to the same standard as a college professor's published articles. One other thing that I would like to point out, because Churchill, Ortiz, and Connell make reference to it, is that with the closing of Fort Atkinson in 1827 there were no soldiers stationed on the Missouri River during the 1830's. If there were no soldiers present during the 1837 smallpox, how could soldiers have given the Indians smallpox blankets. It was this fabrication by Churchill that made other historians check Churchill's sited references. Another Reader's View on Genocide:
Here is a reader that actually signed his name - Moron
Reply: Many people that know me claim I have never changed my mind on anything, and I certainly haven't changed it on genocide. I agree with another reader's view point on the genocide of Jews and Armenian people. A Different View on the Spread of Smallpox:
This reader did not leave a name.
Another View Point:
This writer did not leave their name:
Reply:
Do you need an easy personalized gift? My first historical novel Mountains of Stone will be signed with your message, and along with a picture CD, mailed directly to anyone you designate. Click on logo for details. Mountains of Stone contains an abridged account of the important aspects of the Lewis and Clark Expedition, as well as, some of the major Hudson's Bay and North West Company explorers. The extensive bibliography for Mountains of Stone served as background information on the articles for this website. There have been many requests for copies of pictures from the website. The best website pictures, and others from Jackson Hole, Yellowstone, and Star Valley, Wyoming, have been put on a CD. The pictures make beautiful screensavers, or can be used as a slide show in Windows XP. When ordering Mountains of Stone, request the CD and I will send it free with the book. To view a sample of pictures, click on... To email a comment, a question, or a suggestion click on Mountain Man. To return to the link bars click on Mountain Man logo.
Article References: Bray, R. S.. Armies of Pestilence-The Impact of Disease on History. Barnes & Nobel Inc., New York, 1994. Chittenden, Hiram Martin. The American Fur Trade of the Far West. Bison Books, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska, Volume II, 1986. DeVoto, Bernard. Across the Wide Missouri. Houghton Muffin Company, Boston, Mass., 1947. Haines, Francis. The Plains Indians –Their Origins, Migrations and Cultural Development. Fitzhenry and Whiteside Ltd., Toronto, Canada, 1976. Stearn, E. and Stearn. A. "Smallpox Immunization of the Amerindian." Bulletin of the History of Medicine 13:601-13.) Tebbel, John and Jennison , Kieth. The American Indian Wars. Castle Books. Edison, N.J. 2003. Wallace, Anthony. Jefferson and the Indians - The Tragic Fate of the First Americans, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 1999. Internet Sites: Compulsory Vaccination in England by William Tebb http://www.nativeweb.org/pages/legal/amherst/lord_jeff.html http://www.sc.edu/library/spcoll/nathist/jenner.html http://www.iwchildren.org/missionary.htm http://www.hist.umn.edu/~rmccaa/inoc1794/inoc.htm
|
|
|